• 2022-09
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-04
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-07
  • 2018-07
  • 3X FLAG Peptide br Center for Cancer Immunology and Cutaneous Biology


    1Center for Cancer Immunology and Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
    3Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA; and 4Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
    5These authors contributed equally to this work.
    Correspondence: Shadmehr Demehri, Department of Dermatology and MGH Cancer Center, Building 149 13th Street, 3rd Floor, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA. E-mail:
    Abbreviations: DLE, discoid lupus erythematosus; DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; Th, T helper; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; Treg, regulatory T cell
    highlights the need to better understand the etiology of skin cancer development in this disease.
    Several factors may predispose DLE patients to skin cancer. UVR is an established risk factor for SCC; UV exposure triggers lupus flares, and DLE lesions occur preferentially on UV-exposed areas of the body (Chen et al., 2013; Fernandez and Kirou, 2016). Immunosuppressive medications used to treat cutaneous lupus, like mycophenolate mofetil, tacroli-mus, and azathioprine, may promote SCC development by suppressing the antitumor immune response in the skin (Walling and Sontheimer, 2009). However, a similar preva-lence of SCC is reported among DLE patients who never received systemic immunosuppressive medications (Tao et al., 2012). Inflammation and scarring are other potential risk factors for skin cancer. Inflammation in DLE lesions is characterized as predominantly T helper (Th) type 1 mediated (Jabbari et al., 2014). Therefore, cancer development within such a tumor-suppressive immune environment, albeit in a small subset of DLE patients, raises the need to determine the nature of 3X FLAG Peptide specifically in DLE lesions susceptible to SCC development.
    Although there are several potential tumor-inducing factors affecting DLE, the pathophysiology underlying the development of DLE-associated SCC has not been defined. Long-term follow-up of SCC-prone DLE lesions in African American patients suggested the role of inflammation as the promoter of SCC in DLE. We showed that DLE inflammation in the absence of scarring and systemic immunosuppression significantly enhanced skin cancer development in mice ho-mozygous for the lymphoproliferation spontaneous mutation
    62 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2019), Volume 139ª 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier, Inc. on behalf of the Society for Investigative Dermatology.
    A Zaalberg et al. DLE-Associated Inflammation Promotes Skin Cancer
    Figure 1. Skin cancer development is associated with areas of active skin inflammation in DLE. (a) Clinical and pathological images of three independent skin cancers, (1) SCCIS, (2) SCC, and (3) SCCIS, that were diagnosed concurrently at the margins of a depigmented DLE plaque on a patient’s sun-exposed skin are shown. (b) The review of clinical images and pathology reports shows the locations of neoplastic skin lesions (SCC, SCCIS, and AK) and active LE inflammation that were biopsied to rule out skin cancer during the 8-year follow-up period on the stable DLE plaque. Each lesion is mapped onto a topographic outline of the DLE plaque with the opposite gradients of scarring and inflammation in DLE highlighted in the background. (c) The extent of dermal scarring (Masson’s trichrome stain) and inflammation (CD45 stain) are shown in the patient’s skin cancer compared with aged-matched normal facial skin. The insert shows a positive control for Masson’s trichrome staining in a skin sample with scarring. Cytoplasm and muscle fibers stain red, whereas collagen displays blue coloration. Scale bars ¼ 100 mm. AK, actinic keratosis; LE, lupus erythematosus; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SCCIS, squamous cell carcinoma in situ. Photograph published with patient’s consent.
    (Faslpr) in the susceptible MRL/Mp strain (MRL/lpr) (Horiguchi labels 1 and 3) and invasive SCC (Figure 1a, label 2). The pa-
    et al., 1987; Kanauchi et al., 1991). Furthermore, we identi- tient’s facial DLE plaque had developed several years before
    fied an abundance of tumor-promoting immune cells and her initial presentation and maintained its shape and size
    cytokines in lupus inflammation. We showed that blocking during the 8-year follow-up period with widespread depig-
    cutaneous lupus inflammation with tacrolimus prevented skin mentation, active inflammation toward the periphery (depic-
    cancer development in MRL/lpr mice accompanied by sig-